Darrell Jackson v. Warden Burl Cain

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[n]o such consent is required” for referrals under Section 636(b)
• stating that a prisoner punished by solitary confinement and a loss of good-time credits must receive (1
• stating that this Court may affirm the district court’s judgment on any ground supported by the record
• holding in context of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action that court is not required to appoint counsel for indigent plaintiff unless case presents exceptional circumstances
• holding the use of shackles is not cruel and unusual, because “shackles and handcuffs are restrains commonly used on inmates”
• finding that inmate reassignment from “light work” to backbreaking labor with punishment unit was a qualifying retaliatory act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).