Court of Appeals of Maryland· 10/14/2009
Bible v. State
Citations
- 982 A.2d 348
- 411 Md. 138
- 2009 Md. LEXIS 744
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that touching of clothed buttocks is prohibited \sexual contact\
- holding that statute reaches touching of clothed buttocks
- “Because ‘intent is subjective and, without the cooperation of the accused, cannot be directly and objectively proven, its presence must be shown by established facts which permit a proper inference of its existence.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Harrell, Battaglia, Greene, Murphy, Adkins, Eldridge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-07-23· cited 91×
- Cox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-09-20· cited 52×
- Wilder v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-03-25· cited 40×
- State v. ManionCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-04-01· cited 28×
- Donati v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-01-29· cited 26×
- King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-25· cited 24×
- Titus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-11-29· cited 23×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-11-19· cited 22×
- ABDUL-MALEEK v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-04-27· cited 21×
- Markham v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-11-25· cited 18×
- Rafael Larios-Reyes v. Loretta LynchFourth Circuit· 2016-12-06· cited 18×
- Pedro Jimenez-Cedillo v. Jefferson Sessions IIIFourth Circuit· 2018-03-20· cited 18×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-12-21· cited 14×
- Handy v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-10-26· cited 12×
- Sewell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-11-29· cited 12×
- Yates v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-12-22· cited 12×
- United States v. Osmin AlfaroFourth Circuit· 2016-08-29· cited 11×
- Stevenson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-04-02· cited 10×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-04· cited 10×
- Nash v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-03-26· cited 9×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1952-01-07· cited 3,056×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-05-09· cited 144×
- State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-03-15· cited 120×
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-05-29· cited 115×
- State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-11-18· cited 101×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-02-18· cited 99×
- State v. LylesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-11-25· cited 87×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-07-29· cited 87×
- Fisher and Utley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-12-17· cited 83×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-12-23· cited 80×
- State v. SuddithCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-02-12· cited 72×
- Bost v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-15· cited 65×
- In Re the Welfare of AdamsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-10-24· cited 58×
- Hayette v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-10-01· cited 52×
- Moosavi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-08-30· cited 50×
- Paulino v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-06-04· cited 44×
- Thornton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-03-20· cited 38×
- Stachowski v. Sysco Food Services of Baltimore, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-12-11· cited 38×
- Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1981-08-04· cited 33×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.