Oregon Supreme Court· 9/28/1995

Stevens v. State

Citations

902 P.2d 1137
322 Or. 101
1995 Ore. LEXIS 112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reversing the post-conviction court’s judgment because this court independently determined that trial counsel’s investigation had not been reasonable
reversing the post-conviction court’s judgment because this court independently determined that trial counsel’s investi- gation had not been reasonable
reversing the post-conviction court’s judgment because this court independently determined that trial counsel’s investi- gation had not been reasonable
finding prejudice because \trial counsel's inadequate performance denied petitioner highly valuable impeaching evidence from disinterested witnesses that would have called into question pivotal testimony of the complaining witness\
evaluating the trial counsel’s decision not to interview the complaining witness’s teachers and classmates in light of “the likely costs and potential benefits of pursuing the investigation”
describing elements of claim for post-conviction relief and evidence in post-conviction proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Unis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

87 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.