Ryan v. Palmateer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting on state constitutional grounds the concept that multiple errors that do not, individually cause prejudice, can nonetheless be a basis for reversal as “structural error”
• rejecting petitioner’s argument for “structural error” when he could show no prejudice
• defendant's bare assertion he would have accepted a favorable plea agreement was insufficient to carry his burden of proving that defense counsel failed to provide adequate representation
• “[Structural error is a doctrine that originated in federal criminal cases and * * * has not been adopted by this court as an aspect of Oregon law[.]”
• “[Structural error is a doctrine that originated in federal criminal cases and * * * has not been adopted by this court as an aspect of Oregon law[.]”
• “[Structural error is a doctrine that originated in federal criminal cases and * * * has not been adopted by this court as an aspect of Oregon law[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).