Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2/28/1996

Ashley v. Hoyt

Citations

912 P.2d 393
139 Or. App. 385
1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 250

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

rejecting, in light of Stevens, post-conviction trial court’s adoption of “reasonable probability” standard for prejudice
declining, in light of facts susceptible to differing interpretations, to “imply any view as to the ultimate credibility or persuasiveness” of omitted evidence
describing the choices and ultimately choosing to address the legal question of prejudice without remand because the post-conviction court rendered sufficient factual findings
on post-conviction, the existence of prejudice is a question of law that may be dependent on predicate facts
“a reasonable probability” that the “result would have been different” is too rigorous a standard
\a reasonable probability\ that the \result would have been different\ is too rigorous a standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Deits, Landau, Haselton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.