Court of Appeals of Washington· 9/4/2008
Stevens County v. Futurewise
Citations
- 192 P.3d 1
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- A party asserting res judicata as a defense must prove the challenged action is identical to an earlier action in: (1) identity of parties, (2) subject matter, (3) cause of action, and (4) the quality of the persons against whom the claim is made.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kulik
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Stephen Kerr Eugster v. Washington State Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2017-05-02· cited 27×
- Kitsap Alliance of Property Owners v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-01-04· cited 19×
- Ferry County v. Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-09-23· cited 12×
- Riverview Community Group v. Spencer & LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-02-14· cited 8×
- Spokane County v. MiotkeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-10-12· cited 5×
- Stevens County v. Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-09-22· cited 4×
- Heritage Baptist Church v. Central Puget Sound Growth ManagementCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2018-03-12· cited 3×
- Irondale Community Action Neighbors v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-09-07· cited 2×
- Ican v. Western Growth Mgmt. Hearings Bd.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-09-07
- Kitsap Alliance v. Cent. Puget Sound GrowthCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-03-10
- Joshua Penner V. Central Puget Sound Regional Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2023-03-21
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re the Detention of LaBelleWashington Supreme Court· 1986-11-13· cited 448×
- A. v. Costantini v. Trans World Airlines and Does I Through XcNinth Circuit· 1982-07-22· cited 346×
- King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court· 2000-12-14· cited 255×
- King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court· 2000-12-14· cited 254×
- Rains v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1983-12-22· cited 247×
- McDaniels v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court· 1987-06-11· cited 210×
- Roberson v. PerezWashington Supreme Court· 2005-12-01· cited 205×
- Spokane Research & Defense Fund v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court· 2005-08-11· cited 158×
- SPOKANE RESEARCH FUND v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court· 2005-08-11· cited 154×
- Loveridge v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1995-01-26· cited 139×
- Reninger v. State Dept. of CorrectionsWashington Supreme Court· 1998-02-26· cited 98×
- Reninger v. Department of CorrectionsWashington Supreme Court· 1998-02-26· cited 96×
- Thurston County v. Cooper Point Ass'nWashington Supreme Court· 2002-11-21· cited 84×
- Matter of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court· 1998-09-03· cited 82×
- Weyerhaeuser v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1994-05-26· cited 68×
- Owens v. KuroWashington Supreme Court· 1960-08-04· cited 67×
- Swinomish Indian v. Western WashingtonWashington Supreme Court· 2007-09-13· cited 33×
- Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court· 2007-09-13· cited 33×
- Clain v. International Steel GroupSecond Circuit· 2006-10-16· cited 31×
- In Re the Election Contest Filed by CodayWashington Supreme Court· 2006-03-09· cited 28×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.