Reninger v. State Dept. of Corrections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that public employees' claims of tortious interference with business expectancy were collaterally estopped by factual determinations made by the Personnel Appeals Board
• holding that public employees’ claims of tortious interference with business expectancy were collaterally es-topped by factual determinations made by the Personnel Appeals Board
• granting preclusive effect to administrative decision, in part, because “[v]ery little 19 of significance distinguished the administrative proceedings in this case from a formal jury trial 20 in superior court”
• boxes for “CCO testimony” and “Offender testimony” under 11 “Evidence Relied Upon” are not checked off
• testing for injustice a \fundamental aspect\ of collateral estoppel doctrine
• testing for injustice a “fundamental aspect” of collateral estoppel doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).