Skip to main content
· 1/26/1995

Loveridge v. Fred Meyer, Inc.

Citations

  • 887 P.2d 898
  • 125 Wash. 2d 759
  • 1995 Wash. LEXIS 55
  • 66 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1755

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding mere awareness of a proceeding, without participation or control, is insufficient to establish privity for res judicata purposes
  • holding “[p]rivity is established in cases where the person exercises actual control or substantially participates in the litigation”
  • holding \[p]rivity is established in cases where the person exercises actual control or substantially participates in the litigation\
  • stating that res judicata prevents litigants from relitigating claims and issues that were litigated, or might have been litigated, in a prior action
  • stating that res judicata prevents litigants from relitigating claims and issues that were litigated, or might have been litigated, in a prior action
  • recognizing the differing motives of employees and the EEOC

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.