Skip to main content

Stephens v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 557 S.E.2d 227
  • 263 Va. 58
  • 2002 Va. LEXIS 6

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the record demonstrates that each shot that the defendant discharged from his firearm was a separate, identifiable act”
  • noting that “Virginia’s constitutional guarantee against double jeopardy affords a defendant the same guarantees as the federal Double Jeopardy Clause”
  • explaining that in a single trial setting the double jeopardy clause “does no more than prevent the sentencing court from prescribing greater punishment than the legislature intended” (quoting Missouri v. Hunter, 459 U.S. 359, 366 (1983))
  • “Virginia’s constitutional guarantee against double jeopardy affords a defendant the same guarantees as the federal Double Jeopardy Clause.”
  • “where completed offense has occurred, a separate charge may be brought for a repetition of the same conduct”
  • each act of shooting from vehicle constituted separate and distinct act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hassell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.