Skip to main content

Walker v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 622 S.E.2d 282
  • 47 Va. App. 114
  • 2005 Va. App. LEXIS 482

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • fact finder could infer defendant intended to detain victim because that is exactly what defendant did
  • Court holding where defendant was convicted and punished only for abduction and acquitted of robbery, he could not be subject upon conviction to separate penalties
  • Court holding where defendant was convicted and punished only for abduction and acquitted of robbery, he could not be subject upon conviction to separate penalties
  • fact finder could infer defendant intended to detain victim because that is exactly what defendant did
  • “Under [Brown], a defendant ‘charged with abduction by detention and another crime that factually includes restraint of the victim (e.g., rape or robbery
  • “In finding [the defendant] guilty, the factfinder necessarily found that [the defendant] forcibly detained [the victim] ‘for the length of time necessary for his purpose.’” (quoting Scott v. Commonwealth, 228 Va. 519, 524, 323 S.E.2d 572, 575 (1984))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelsey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.