Skip to main content

Schwartz v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 581 S.E.2d 891
  • 41 Va. App. 61
  • 2003 Va. App. LEXIS 339

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that consideration of an appellant’s claim of trial court error on appeal was barred by Rule 5A:18 in part “because the circuit court never ruled upon his motion”
  • holding that although the defendant filed a post-trial motion to set aside his convictions, “the circuit court never ruled upon his motion” and the appellate court consequently had “no ruling to review on appeal”
  • holding that the appellant’s “argument [wa]s barred by Rule 5A:18 because it was not raised in the circuit court, and because the circuit court never ruled upon his motion to set aside the convictions, providing . . . no ruling to review on appeal”
  • noting that appellant’s inclusion of disputed contention in his motion did not satisfy Rule 5A:18, where “the record [did] not reflect consideration or disposition of [the] motion by the circuit court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Humphreys, Fitzpatrick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.