Skip to main content
· 12/30/2014

Joseph Louis Paduano v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Citations

  • 64 Va. App. 173
  • 766 S.E.2d 745
  • 2014 Va. App. LEXIS 419

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “‘Courts are required to apply the plain language of a statute when possible and may not rewrite it.’” (quoting Parker v. Warren, 273 Va. 20, 23, 639 S.E.2d 179, 181 (2007))
  • “ ‘Courts are required to apply the plain language of a statute when possible and may not rewrite it.’ ” (quoting Parker v. Warren, 273 Va. 20, 23, 639 S.E.2d 179, 181 (2007))
  • “If a statute is not ambiguous, . . . ‘the rule of lenity is not applicable to guide statutory interpretation.’” (quoting De’Armond v. Commonwealth, 51 Va. App. 26, 34, 654 S.E.2d 317, 321 (2007))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Annunziata, Huff, Petty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.