S.D. New York· 3/28/2000
Steinberg v. PRT Group, Inc.
Citations
- 88 F. Supp. 2d 294
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3963
- 2000 WL 328786
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he language cited ‘must precisely address the substance of the specific statement or omission that is challenged.’ ”
- Statements that expressed the company’s “belief in its competitive advantage” were not actionable.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Livent, Inc. Noteholders Securities Litig.S.D. New York· 2001-06-29· cited 173×
- In Re Ambac Financial Group, Inc. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2010-04-29· cited 65×
- In Re Independent Energy Holdings PLC Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2001-07-26· cited 54×
- In Re Vivendi Universal, S.A. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2003-11-03· cited 52×
- In re Bioscrip, Inc. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2015-03-31· cited 41×
- In Re Sterling Foster & Co., Inc., Securities Lit.E.D. New York· 2002-06-27· cited 39×
- Miller v. Lazard, Ltd.S.D. New York· 2007-02-07· cited 32×
- In re General Electric Co. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2012-01-11· cited 31×
- Garber v. Legg Mason, Inc.S.D. New York· 2008-03-17· cited 30×
- Lin v. Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.S.D. New York· 2008-08-22· cited 23×
- Okla. Firefighters Pension & Ret. Sys. v. Xerox Corp.S.D. Illinois· 2018-03-20· cited 23×
- In Re Cosi, Inc. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2005-07-27· cited 20×
- DeMaria v. AndersenS.D. New York· 2001-03-29· cited 16×
- In Re iac/interactivecorp Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2010-03-19· cited 12×
- Ning Yu v. State Street Corp.S.D. New York· 2010-02-25· cited 9×
- Sedighim v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc.S.D. New York· 2001-10-05· cited 4×
- Rieger ex rel. Walters v. DrabinskyS.D. New York· 2001-06-29· cited 2×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court· 1962-12-03· cited 17,205×
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court· 1976-06-14· cited 2,447×
- Ryder Energy Distribution Corporation v. Merrill Lynch Commodities Inc., E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc., and New York Mercantile ExchangeSecond Circuit· 1984-11-15· cited 571×
- San Leandro Emergency Medical Group Profit Sharing Plan v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Second Circuit· 1996-01-25· cited 563×
- Goldman v. BeldenSecond Circuit· 1985-02-12· cited 524×
- Cooper v. ParskySecond Circuit· 1998-04-02· cited 340×
- Eugene T. King, Jr. v. John R. Simpson, Eastern Regional Commissioner, United States Parole CommissionSecond Circuit· 1999-08-20· cited 311×
- Luce v. EdelsteinSecond Circuit· 1986-09-26· cited 234×
- Wherehouse Entertainment, Inc. v. McMahan & Co.Supreme Court· 1991-06-28· cited 143×
- Olkey v. Hyperion 1999 Term Trust, Inc.Second Circuit· 1996-10-15· cited 126×
- In Re Prudential SEC. Inc. Ltd. Partner. Lit.S.D. New York· 1996-06-10· cited 102×
- In Re Verifone Securities LitigationN.D. California· 1992-02-21· cited 98×
- McMahan & Co. v. Wherehouse Entertainment, Inc.Second Circuit· 1990-04-10· cited 67×
- Barnum v. Millbrook Care Ltd. PartnershipS.D. New York· 1994-05-12· cited 65×
- Milman v. Box Hill Systems Corp.S.D. New York· 1999-08-17· cited 40×
- Schoenhaut v. American Sensors, Inc.S.D. New York· 1997-11-14· cited 34×
- In Re Convergent Technologies Securities LitigationN.D. California· 1988-11-22· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.