Steinberg v. PRT Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he language cited ‘must precisely address the substance of the specific statement or omission that is challenged.’ ”
• Statements that expressed the company’s “belief in its competitive advantage” were not actionable.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).