Miller v. Lazard, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that although plaintiffs may use news articles, those news articles still must state particularized facts
• “In assessing whether statements provided in the prospectus are materially misleading, the prospectus must be read as a whole, not selectively or in a piecemeal fashion.”
• “Repeated 11 conclusory allegations . . . do not satisfy Rule 9(b) pleading standards.”
• “A court may dismiss a claim on the ground that a misstatement or an omission in a registration statement or prospectus was not material, but the task presents a difficult challenge. Materiality is generally a question for the fact finder.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).