Skip to main content
· 2/21/1992

In Re Verifone Securities Litigation

Citations

  • 784 F. Supp. 1471
  • 1992 WL 35559

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing that a securities analyst is not motivated to inflate projections of stock performance because “the analyst’s reputation and livelihood depend solely on the analyst’s ability to be correct”
  • “conclusory assertion that the projections ... lacked a reasonable basis” was “unsubstantiated conclusion” and “insufficient to satisfy Rule 9(b)”
  • “shareholders and potential investors are most in need of ‘hard’ information such as sales and profit data, because such information is in the exclusive control of the corporation”
  • “Professional investors, and most amateur investors as well, know 3 how to devalue the optimism of corporate executives, who have a personal stake in the 4 future success of the company.”
  • “Professional investors, and most amateur investors as well, know how to 3 devalue the optimism of corporate executives, who have a personal stake in the future 4 success of the company.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.