Stehno v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The valid business expectancy requirement involves more than a mere subjective expectancy — it must be □ a reasonable expectancy ... 2’
• “The valid business expectancy requirement involves more than a mere subjective expectancy—it must be a reasonable expectancy ....”
• “CST had a reasonabl[e] business expectancy to be selected as the . . . subcontractor.”
• “Even if there is an economic justification for interfering with a business expectancy, the interfering party must not employ improper means.”
• \a business expectancy sufficient to support a claim for tortious interference with business *Page 22 expectancy need not be based on an existing contract; a probable future business relationship that gives rise to a reasonable expectancy of financial benefit is enough\
• elements of Missouri tortious interference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).