Skip to main content
· 8/4/1992

Eggleston v. Phillips

Citations

  • 838 S.W.2d 80
  • 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1283
  • 1992 WL 182306

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where a corporate officer is the defendant, absence of justification requires that the officer interfere with the contract for personal benefit, plus that the officer employed improper means; both, not one or the other, are required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ahrens, Karohl, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.