Bell v. May Department Stores Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the first element in a claim for tortious interference with a credit expectancy is “a valid credit expectancy.”
• \valid credit expectancy\ exists where \plaintiff expect[s] to apply for credit\ and has \a reasonable chance of obtaining credit\ (emphasis in original)
• reasonable time for rejecting defective goods under a contract is a jury question
• the actions of the parties may affect what constitutes a reasonable time

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).