Skip to main content
· 8/27/2013

Farrow v. Saint Francis Medical Center

Citations

  • 407 S.W.3d 579
  • 2013 WL 4520993
  • 2013 Mo. LEXIS 249
  • 119 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1846

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the party asserting the privilege must present testimony or evidence that establishes the existence of the privilege
  • stating that the party asserting the privilege must present testimony or evidence that establishes the existence of the privilege
  • stating that courts \must not interpret the statute in a manner that renders any part of the statute meaningless or superfluous\ (quotation marks omitted)
  • stating that a party claiming a privilege does not have an adequate remedy by appeal when the trial court erroneously orders the production of privileged documents
  • stating that a party claiming a privilege does not have an adequate remedy by appeal when the trial court erroneously orders the production of privileged documents
  • stating an in camera review of documents is required once a prima facie case for the privilege is established

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breckenridge, Fischer, III, Russell, Stith, Teitelman, Wilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.