Idaho Supreme Court· 4/2/1992

State v. Zimmerman

Citations

829 P.2d 861
121 Idaho 971
1992 Ida. LEXIS 86

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “a psychologist does not provide ‘medical’ treatment as contemplated by” I.R.E. 803(4)
conviction reversed when Court could not say that beyond a reasonable doubt there was no reasonable possibility that improperly admitted hearsay statements contributed to the conviction
review of record demonstrates that the trial court conducted a balancing analysis despite lack of specific finding
testimony of sleep talk inadmissible; not relevant due to lack of probative value regarding actual events and inherent unreliability
“[T]o the extent that this statute attempts to prescribe the admissibility of hearsay evidence . . . it is of no force or effect.”
“[T]o the extent that this statute attempts to prescribe the admissibility of hearsay evidence . . . it is of no force or effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Bakes, McDevitt, Boyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.