Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Idaho Supreme Court· 7/3/2017

State v. Mark Lankford

Citations

  • 162 Idaho 477
  • 399 P.3d 804
  • 2017 WL 2838135
  • 2017 Ida. LEXIS 201

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • listing sixteen instances where the prosecutor stated the defendant lied or was a liar
  • \We presume that the jury followed the jury instruction given by the trial court in reaching its verdict....\
  • “[W]e do not think [the prosecutor’s comments] were so egregious or inflammatory that they would not have been cured by the court’s instruction.”
  • “[A]lthough the repeated use of the term “liar” and its various grammatical forms is troubling and ill-advised, it did not rise to the level of prosecutorial misconduct”
  • declining to address the issue
  • declining to address the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horton, Burdick, Eismann, Jones, Brody

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

103 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Mark Lankford

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.