Skip to main content

State v. Younger

Citations

  • 305 N.J. Super. 250
  • 702 A.2d 477
  • 1997 N.J. Super. LEXIS 408

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • underscoring that the PDVA is subject both to the Fourth Amendment and “to the New Jersey constitutional guarantee against unreasonable searches and seizures”
  • noting that “the permissible scope in each case will be dependent on the circumstances, including the extent and nature of the officer’s probable cause to believe that there is a dangerous weapon on the premises and the degree of exigency of the situation”
  • although homeowner/wife consented to search of bedroom, she lacked authority to consent to search of closed change purse belong ing to defendant/husband during search of home
  • although homeowner/wife consented to search of bedroom, she lacked authority to consent to search of closed change purse belonging to defendant/husband during search of home

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pressler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.