Washington Supreme Court· 6/11/1998
State v. Young
Citations
- 135 Wash. 2d 498
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that under the totality of the circumstances, illuminating the defendant with a spotlight does not a seizure make
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alexander, Talmadge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. LuedemannIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-10-05· cited 525×
- State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court· 2003-01-30· cited 427×
- State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court· 1999-01-28· cited 310×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1999-12-16· cited 208×
- State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court· 1998-06-11· cited 169×
- State v. RankinWashington Supreme Court· 2004-06-10· cited 161×
- State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court· 2007-05-10· cited 154×
- State v. KinzyWashington Supreme Court· 2000-07-27· cited 140×
- State of Iowa v. Isaac Andrew Baldon IIISupreme Court of Iowa· 2013-04-19· cited 132×
- State v. PattonWashington Supreme Court· 2009-10-22· cited 111×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2009-09-01· cited 110×
- State v. HarringtonWashington Supreme Court· 2009-12-10· cited 81×
- State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-03-11· cited 69×
- State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court· 2007-01-11· cited 47×
- State v. VillarrealCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-09-30· cited 36×
- State v. SamaliaWashington Supreme Court· 2016-07-28· cited 36×
- State v. MorenoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-02-12· cited 34×
- State v. MoteCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-08-29· cited 31×
- State v. MechamWashington Supreme Court· 2016-06-16· cited 27×
- State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-02-02· cited 27×
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 3,670×
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court· 1986-06-12· cited 1,052×
- State v. ArmentaWashington Supreme Court· 1997-12-24· cited 270×
- State v. BolandWashington Supreme Court· 1990-11-15· cited 249×
- State v. OquendoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-08-25· cited 219×
- Commonwealth v. MatosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-02-26· cited 208×
- State v. TuckerSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1993-06-25· cited 196×
- Commonwealth v. StouteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1996-05-30· cited 178×
- State v. TuckerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1994-06-22· cited 130×
- In Re the Welfare of E.D.J.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-07-09· cited 126×
- State v. ThornWashington Supreme Court· 1996-05-30· cited 117×
- State v. QuinoHawaii Supreme Court· 1992-10-28· cited 97×
- State v. StroudCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-09-28· cited 87×
- State v. GoucherWashington Supreme Court· 1994-09-29· cited 79×
- Harper v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1994-04-07· cited 72×
- State v. RoseWashington Supreme Court· 1996-01-11· cited 67×
- Perez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-06-24· cited 65×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.