State v. Ivie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing the legislative history of ORS 137.750 and noting that “earned time” is a sentence modification program
• The prosecutor informed the trial court, “ ‘We have a stipulated plea agreement * * *.’ ”
• under ORS 137.750, a sentencing court must order that the defendant be considered for enumerated release programs unless the court makes required findings
• trial court erred in denying consider- ation for sentence modification programs without making the findings required by ORS 137.750
• under ORS 138.222(2)(d), “[i]f some aspects of a sentence comport with the stipulation and others do not, the portions that were not part of the stipulation are reviewable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Capri
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-02-29· cited 20×
• State v. Carson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-10-27· cited 16×
• State v. Berger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-03-01· cited 7×
• State v. Nunes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-11-28· cited 4×
• State v. Pierce
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-08-12· cited 4×
• State v. NOLASCO-LARA
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-03-28· cited 2×
• State v. Patterson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-02-19· cited 2×
• State v. Grover
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-11-21

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Davis v. O'BRIEN
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-04-06· cited 135×
• EVENSON MASONRY INCORPORATED v. Eldred
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1975-12-18· cited 19×
• State v. Upton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-02-01· cited 11×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-05-17· cited 8×
• State v. Young
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-06-12· cited 8×
• State v. Chavez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-02-21· cited 3×