Washington Supreme Court· 9/15/2005
State v. O'CONNOR
Citations
- 119 P.3d 806
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in exercising its discretion in ruling on an ER 608 objection, the court “may consider whether the instance of misconduct is relevant to the witness’s veracity on the stand and whether it is germane or relevant to the issues presented at trial”
- “In exercising its discretion [to admit or exclude evidence under ER 608(b)], the trial court may consider whether the instance of misconduct is relevant to the witness’s veracity on the stand and whether it is germane or relevant to the issues presented at trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bridge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court· 2006-11-30· cited 392×
- State v. GeorgeWashington Supreme Court· 2007-06-07· cited 61×
- State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-09-21· cited 27×
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-01-05· cited 25×
- State Of Washington, V. Troy C. RestvedtCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2023-04-11· cited 15×
- State v. WomacCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-11-22· cited 14×
- State v. HaglerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-05-26· cited 12×
- State v. Abdi-IssaWashington Supreme Court· 2022-02-17· cited 7×
- Harbottle v. BraunCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2019-08-27· cited 4×
- State Of Washington, V. Bernard BelleroucheCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2025-03-17· cited 4×
- State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court· 2006-12-22· cited 1×
- State v. LeeWashington Supreme Court· 2017-06-15
- State v. MunsonIdaho Court of Appeals· 2020-02-19
- State Of Washington, V. Bernard BelleroucheCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2025-03-03
- State Of Washington, Resp/cross-app V. Brogan R. Bartch, App/cross Resp.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2023-10-30
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court· 2004-01-29· cited 973×
- State v. PowellWashington Supreme Court· 1995-04-13· cited 542×
- State v. DardenWashington Supreme Court· 2002-03-07· cited 345×
- State v. BennWashington Supreme Court· 1993-02-11· cited 303×
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court· 2001-01-16· cited 230×
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceWashington Supreme Court· 2000-12-21· cited 224×
- State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court· 2001-06-07· cited 214×
- State v. NealWashington Supreme Court· 2001-09-06· cited 199×
- Mayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1994-08-04· cited 194×
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1997-12-04· cited 149×
- State ex rel. Citizens v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court· 2004-04-08· cited 121×
- STATE EX REL.(CAT) v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court· 2004-04-08· cited 120×
- United States v. John M. Logan (99-6176) Alan Michael Laws(99-6198)Sixth Circuit· 2001-05-11· cited 92×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 2002-12-12· cited 89×
- United States v. Thongsangoune SayakhomNinth Circuit· 1999-12-01· cited 88×
- United States v. James L. Hays and Weldon J. HaysFifth Circuit· 1989-04-25· cited 71×
- State v. GanoHawaii Supreme Court· 1999-12-08· cited 59×
- United States v. BaileyTenth Circuit· 2003-04-25· cited 58×
- United States v. Maynard John VerdoornEighth Circuit· 1976-01-13· cited 54×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.