State v. Salisbury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Thus, even if the state is able to satisfy the requirements of ORS 133.033, it must also satisfy the requirements of the emergency aid doctrine.”
• officers heard yelling and screaming within the curtilage of an apartment consistent wdth a “domestic quarrel,” but that did not indicate that violence was occurring and did not justify entry under “emergency aid doctrine”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Pierce
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-03-04· cited 14×
• State v. Mazzola
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-10-27· cited 10×
• State v. Yen Lin Wan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-07-05· cited 10×
• State v. Fredricks
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-03· cited 5×
• State v. Baker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-09-22· cited 4×
• State v. Tabib
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-17· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ball v. Gladden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 849×
• State v. Stevens
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-02-07· cited 332×
• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-06-29· cited 279×
• State v. Follett
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-10-21· cited 53×
• State v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-09-03· cited 27×
• State v. Burdick
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-12-06· cited 15×
• State v. Goodall
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-04-16· cited 9×