Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 4/27/2004
State v. Kier
Citations
- 678 N.W.2d 672
- 2004 Minn. App. LEXIS 394
- 2004 WL 887172
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[a]n officer needs only one objective indication of intoxication to constitute probable cause to believe a person is under the influence”
- stating that “[a]n officer needs only one objective indication of intoxication to constitute probable cause to believe a person is under the influence”
- noting that odor of alcohol, bloodshot and watery eyes, and slurred speech are indicia of intoxication
- “An officer needs only one objective indication of intoxication to constitute probable cause to believe a person is under the influence.”
- “Common indicia of intoxication include an odor of alcohol, . . . , slurred speech, and an uncooperative attitude.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Willis, Schumacher, Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-07-27· cited 6×
- State v. RiversCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-08-17· cited 5×
- In re the Welfare of I.N.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2017-09-05· cited 3×
- State v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2005-08-02· cited 2×
- State of Minnesota v. Heather Marie MangenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2025-07-14
- Thushari Rangika Alahapperuma v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-05-06
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-04-26· cited 235×
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-08-29· cited 192×
- Watson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-07-10· cited 106×
- State v. SpainSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-02-25· cited 50×
- State v. CurtissCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-08-21· cited 47×
- Holtz v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1983-12-07· cited 42×
- State v. WynneSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-08-08· cited 29×
- State, Lake Minnetonka Conservation District v. HornerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-10-12· cited 29×
- Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. League of Minnesota Cities Insurance TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-04-24· cited 28×
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-06-07· cited 18×
- State v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-08-22· cited 12×
- Hasbrook v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-10-08· cited 11×
- State v. CarverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-04-14· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.