Oregon Supreme Court· 8/6/1992
Porter v. Hill
Citations
- 838 P.2d 45
- 314 Or. 86
- 1992 Ore. LEXIS 154
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “filing a civil action to collect an alleged debt is not an act attempting to enforce a ‘right’ or ‘remedy’ proscribed by ORS 646.639(2)(k) merely because all or part of the alleged debt does not exist”
- explaining that, in the civil context, an allegation that an amount was a “finance charge” is a legal conclusion, not a well-pleaded fact that is assumed to be true
- The context of a statute “includes other statutes relating to the same subject matter.”
- The context of a statute \includes other statutes relating to the same subject matter.\
- “The statute . . . prohibits the debt collector from using unfair practices to collect it. Nothing in the statute evidences a legislative concern . . . distinct from the use of abusive methods to pressure debtors to pay their debts.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Graber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lyon v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.Ninth Circuit· 2011-08-30· cited 95×
- State v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court· 1993-02-11· cited 83×
- Boone v. WrightOregon Supreme Court· 1992-08-20· cited 74×
- Fontell v. HassettD. Maryland· 2012-06-28· cited 57×
- State Ex Rel. Willis v. WillisOregon Supreme Court· 1992-11-05· cited 36×
- Sanders v. Oregon Pacific States InsuranceOregon Supreme Court· 1992-10-29· cited 31×
- State v. WrightOregon Supreme Court· 1992-12-24· cited 24×
- Arnett v. Bank of AmericaD. Oregon· 2012-07-11· cited 20×
- In the Matter of Marriage of Petersen and PetersenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-12-28· cited 18×
- Westfall v. Rust International & Underwriters Adjusting Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-11-05· cited 18×
- Gregory's, Inc. v. HaanSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-04-04· cited 15×
- Iberlin v. TCI Cablevision of Wyoming, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court· 1993-06-25· cited 13×
- Haynes v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-06-23· cited 11×
- In re the Marriage of RossiCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-06-22· cited 10×
- Steele v. a & B Automotive & Towing Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-07-26· cited 9×
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KochOregon Supreme Court· 2008-12-11· cited 7×
- Hedrick v. SpearCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-11-29· cited 7×
- Krieger v. JustCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-12-09· cited 5×
- Houston v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-07-23· cited 5×
- Otterness v. City of WaldportCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-10-12· cited 4×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Davis v. Wasco Intermediate Education DistrictOregon Supreme Court· 1979-05-01· cited 71×
- Madani v. Kendall Ford, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-10-10· cited 68×
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. AshleyOregon Supreme Court· 1991-10-10· cited 63×
- Kankkonen v. HENDRICKSONOregon Supreme Court· 1962-09-06· cited 39×
- Isom v. Portland General Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-02-22· cited 11×
- Rogers Mortuary, Inc. v. WhiteNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1979-04-10· cited 9×
- Rowe v. Bank of the CascadesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-06-06· cited 6×
- Porter v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-08-21· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.