Skip to main content

Porter v. Hill

Citations

  • 838 P.2d 45
  • 314 Or. 86
  • 1992 Ore. LEXIS 154

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “filing a civil action to collect an alleged debt is not an act attempting to enforce a ‘right’ or ‘remedy’ proscribed by ORS 646.639(2)(k) merely because all or part of the alleged debt does not exist”
  • explaining that, in the civil context, an allegation that an amount was a “finance charge” is a legal conclusion, not a well-pleaded fact that is assumed to be true
  • The context of a statute “includes other statutes relating to the same subject matter.”
  • The context of a statute \includes other statutes relating to the same subject matter.\
  • “The statute . . . prohibits the debt collector from using unfair practices to collect it. Nothing in the statute evidences a legislative concern . . . distinct from the use of abusive methods to pressure debtors to pay their debts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.