Court of Appeals of Washington· 3/28/1995

State v. Wright

Citations

888 P.2d 1214
76 Wash. App. 811

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

nothing misleading or unfair in stating the obvious: that if the jury accepts one version of the facts, it must necessarily reject a diametrically opposed version
nothing misleading or unfair in stating the obvious: that if the jury accepts one version of the facts, it must necessarily reject a diametrically opposed version
misconduct to argue that in order to believe or acquit the defendant, jury must find the State's witnesses lied
misconduct to argue that the jury must find the State's witnesses are lying in order to believe the defendant
“[T]he current sentencing court is not bound by an earlier determination of whether to count the offenses as one offense or separate offenses.”
misconduct to argue that in order to believe or acquit the defendant, jury must find the State’s witnesses lied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aged, Pekelis, Becker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.