State v. Suarez-Bravo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding evidence defendant lived in a high-crime area was too prejudicial and it “smacks of prohibited profile evidence” because it merely suggested that the defendant was a criminal type
• reversing tlie conviction in part because of the prejudicial nature of the prosecution’s repeated attempts to get the defendant to call the police witnesses liars and its misrepresentation of the witnesses’ testimony in order to create a conflict in the testimony which did not exist
• objections covered relevancy of the prosecutor’s line of questioning and informed the trial court of the basis for the claim of error
• misconduct 7 No. 43745 -7 -II occurred when prosecutor repeatedly attempted to get defendant to call the police witnesses liars

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).