State v. Wright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the mere fact that the police officer who questioned the defendant was his father was not enough to render the confession involuntary
• recognizing an inconsistency in Arizona case law
• “Miranda warnings are not required merely because the questioned person is one whom the police suspect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Barger
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-10-25· cited 42×
• In Re Appeal in Navajo County Juvenile Action No. JV91000058
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-09-07· cited 14×
• State v. Eggers
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-06-29
• State of Arizona v. Zachary Samuel Eggers
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-06-29

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
• Berkemer v. McCarty
  Supreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
• State v. Carter
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-05-21· cited 78×
• State v. Cruz-Mata
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-12-02· cited 60×
• State v. Toney
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-09-24· cited 52×
• State v. Garrison
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1978-09-20· cited 44×
• State v. Hensley
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-06-30· cited 41×
• State v. Perea
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-11-01· cited 31×