Arizona Supreme Court· 9/24/1976

State v. Toney

Citations

555 P.2d 650
113 Ariz. 404
1976 Ariz. LEXIS 325

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting evidence is not insubstantial simply because reasonable persons may draw different conclusions from the evidence
noting a jury is free to credit or discredit witness testimony
appellant waived his objection to the court’s refusal to give his requested instruction by failing to state specific grounds
“Evidence is not insubstantial simply because testimony is conflicting or reasonable persons may draw different conclusions from the evidence.”
“Evidence is not insubstantial simply because testimony is conflicting or reasonable persons may draw different conclusions from the evidence.”
“Evidence is not insubstantial simply because testimony is conflicting or reasonable persons may draw different conclusions from the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hays, Cameron, Struckmeyer, Holohan, Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.