Skip to main content

State v. Woods

Citations

  • 550 S.E.2d 282
  • 345 S.C. 583
  • 2001 S.C. LEXIS 122

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a court may infer that a juror who intentionally conceals information inquired into is not impartial
  • concluding “a juror’s previous three year relationship as a victims’ advocate with the prosecuting solicitor’s office would be a material factor in the use of a criminal defendant’s peremptory challenges”
  • holding “intentional concealment occurs when the question presented to the jury on voir dire is reasonably comprehensible to the average juror” and “[unintentional concealment ... occurs where the question posed is ambiguous or incomprehensible to the average juror”
  • explaining trial court ruled on new trial motion alleging juror concealment after holding an evidentiary hearing during which the juror testified
  • explaining trial court ruled on new trial motion alleging juror concealment after holding an evidentiary hearing during which the juror testified
  • stating juror testified at evidentiary hearing she worked as a volunteer in the solicitor’s office that prosecuted the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pleicones, Toal, Waller, Gregory, Burnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.