State v. Guillebeaux

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding juror did not intentionally conceal existence of social relationship with the State’s chief witness and, thus, trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying defendant’s motion for a new trial
• \The denial of a motion for a new trial will be disturbed on appeal only upon a showing of an abuse of discretion.\
• \[A] determination that a juror did not intentionally conceal the information ends the court's inquiry.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).