State v. Sparkman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding no intentional concealment where the judge asked on voir dire whether anyone had been the victim of a “serious crime” and seated juror did not immediately recall that he had been a victim of a crime forty years earlier and was not sure if the crime constituted a “serious” one

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Coaxum
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-10-08· cited 16×
• McCoy v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-02-06· cited 13×
• Smith v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-12-10· cited 10×
• State v. Guillebeaux
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-12-20· cited 9×
• State v. Wallace
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-03-02· cited 8×
• Lynch v. Carolina Self Storage Centers, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-03-26· cited 6×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-05-23· cited 2×
• State v. Rowell
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-07-07
• State v. Rowell
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-08-04
• State v. Adam Rowell
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2022-03-02

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Harris
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-04-17· cited 71×
• State v. Kelly
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-06-29· cited 68×
• State v. Woods
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-07-16· cited 44×