Supreme Court of Vermont· 8/7/1987

State v. Wood

Citations

536 A.2d 902
148 Vt. 479
1987 Vt. LEXIS 559

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “[o]ne of the main rights attaching to property is the right to exclude others” (quoting Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 143 n.12 (1978))
using Article 11 itself to determine scope of right protected and who could invoke right’s protection in court
rejecting the \legitimate expectation of privacy\ test as a matter of state constitutional law, although not addressing the \automatic standing\ rule
standing to challenge police conduct under Vermont Constitution exists if defendant has possessory, proprietary, or participatory interest in items seized or area searched
discussing the value of adopting a rule that “simplifies the analysis that must be made by courts and those who follow our decision”
discussing the value of adopting a rule that “simplifies the analysis that must be made by courts and those who follow our decision”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Dooley, Barney, Keyser, Springer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.