State v. Zaccaro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that trial court's findings of fact will not be disturbed \unless they are unsupported by the evidence or clearly erroneous\
• noting that trial court’s findings of fact will not be disturbed “unless they are unsupported by the evidence or clearly erroneous”
• noting that “we may look for guidance to persuasive holdings from federal and sister-state jurisdictions” in carrying out Article 11 analysis
• stating that when reviewing denial of suppression motions, “[w]e will not disturb the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are unsupported by the evidence or clearly erroneous.”
• stating that consent is voluntary if not result of duress or coercion
• rejecting argument that trial court improperly “chilled” defendant’s right to confront witnesses in face of “strategic choice” not to introduce testimony that would have opened door to suppressed evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).