State v. Wood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• child welfare agency’s files pertinent to an investigation are presumed to be in the prosecutor’s possession or control and defendant is entitled to discovery of them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hector Clyde WOOD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Frank HALL, Director, Oregon Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee
  Ninth Circuit· 1997-11-19· cited 61×
• State v. Zelinka
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-10-05· cited 22×
• State v. Bassine
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-06-12· cited 8×
• State v. Lammi
  Columbia County Circuit Court· 2016-09-14· cited 6×
• State v. Hernandez-Sanchez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-03-31· cited 4×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Berkemer v. McCarty
  Supreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
• Oregon v. Mathiason
  Supreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
• State v. Smith
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-05-10· cited 205×
• State v. Milbradt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-05-17· cited 149×
• State v. Carlson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-03-21· cited 127×
• State v. Magee
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-10-20· cited 87×
• State v. Warren
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-12-08· cited 29×
• State v. Johns
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-02-11· cited 8×
• State v. Gallup
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-08-28· cited 5×
• State v. Graville
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-12-08· cited 4×