Oregon Supreme Court· 12/8/1987

State v. Warren

Citations

746 P.2d 711
304 Or. 428
1987 Ore. LEXIS 1986

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that the police are considered a part of the prosecution for the purposes of the discovery statute
explaining that, concern- ing a defendant’s discovery right to evidence available to the prosecution, Brady provides that the Due Process Clause prohibits a prosecutor from withholding evidence favorable to the defense
court should not reach constitutional Compulsory Process Clause argument if the defendant has a statutory right to information sought
information is within state’s control if the prosecutor “may obtain [it] directly”
“We agree with the Court of Appeals that, with regard to investigation of crime, ‘[t]he police are an arm of Cite as 321 Or App 460 (2022) 467 the prosecution for the purposes of the discovery statute. * * *’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.