Alaska Supreme Court· 9/14/1979
Reeves v. State
Citations
- 599 P.2d 727
- 1979 Alas. LEXIS 672
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that officer may seize evidence seen from place where officer was legally entitled to be if certain conditions are met
- stating that officer may seize evidence seen from place where officer was legally entitled to be if certain conditions are met
- expressing strong preference for the warrant process under the state constitution
- expressing strong preference for the warrant process under the state constitution
- independent interpretation of State constitutional provision protecting individuals from unreasonable search and seizure
- “The search of an arrestee’s person should be no more intensive than reasonably necessary to prevent the entry of weapons, illegal drugs, and other contraband or potentially dangerous items into the jail.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boochever, Burke, Connor, Matthews, Rabin-Owitz, Rabinowitz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-12-12· cited 762×
- People v. TislerIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-09-20· cited 446×
- State v. SimpsonWashington Supreme Court· 1980-12-31· cited 247×
- State v. FinleyMontana Supreme Court· 1996-04-16· cited 233×
- People v. LaiwaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1983-10-06· cited 181×
- State v. CheatamWashington Supreme Court· 2003-12-11· cited 160×
- State v. DukesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-09-06· cited 152×
- State v. HalczyszakOhio Supreme Court· 1986-08-13· cited 137×
- United States v. Judah Robert LyonsD.C. Circuit· 1983-04-26· cited 130×
- State v. MooreWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1980-11-25· cited 86×
- State v. JonesAlaska Supreme Court· 1985-09-20· cited 81×
- Pooley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-09-06· cited 76×
- State v. NevilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-03-14· cited 64×
- State v. LeeUtah Supreme Court· 1981-06-30· cited 59×
- State v. HyghUtah Supreme Court· 1985-08-16· cited 58×
- People v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado· 1992-06-29· cited 56×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-03-25· cited 43×
- State v. PastosMontana Supreme Court· 1994-12-20· cited 40×
- State v. HamiltonMontana Supreme Court· 2003-04-04· cited 40×
- McGee v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1980-07-25· cited 38×
Cites
93 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1973-12-11· cited 3,538×
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 3,445×
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-06-10· cited 3,146×
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 3,107×
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court· 1977-06-21· cited 2,561×
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-05· cited 1,768×
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-02-20· cited 1,583×
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 1,212×
- United States v. EdwardsSupreme Court· 1974-03-26· cited 917×
- Gustafson v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1973-12-11· cited 699×
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court· 1927-05-31· cited 477×
- Fare v. Tony C.California Supreme Court· 1978-08-24· cited 468×
- Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1974-07-19· cited 323×
- Kellett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1966-01-05· cited 280×
- People v. BrisendineCalifornia Supreme Court· 1975-02-20· cited 267×
- Mozzetti v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-04-30· cited 229×
- State v. KalunaHawaii Supreme Court· 1974-03-18· cited 215×
- Baker v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court· 1970-06-05· cited 211×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.