Skip to main content

State v. Williamson

Citations

  • 166 P.3d 387
  • 144 Idaho 597
  • 2007 Ida. App. LEXIS 43
  • 2007 WL 1438128

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the defendant’s argument that the trial court erroneously admitted lidar-speed evidence because the state had failed to present evidence on the scientific validity of the technology
  • rejecting the defendant's argument that the trial court erroneously admitted lidar-speed evidence because the state had failed to present evidence on the scientific validity of the technology
  • collecting authorities from other states holding that laser speed detection devices are generally reliable and their results admissible in court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Perry, Lansing, Gutierrez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.