Court of Appeals of Maryland· 9/7/1995
Goldstein v. State
Citations
- 339 Md. 563
- 664 A.2d 375
- 1995 Md. LEXIS 123
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- results of a laser speed device were admissible as they are premised on reliable, well-understood scientific principles
- results of a laser speed device were admissible as they are premised on reliable, well-understood scientific principles
- Courts are reluctant to infer legislative intent from legislative inaction where there are several possible reasons for defeat
- Courts are reluctant to infer legislative intent from legislative inaction where there are several possible reasons for defeat
- Courts are reluctant to infer legislative intent from legislative inaction where there are several possible reasons for defeat
- Courts are reluctant to infer legislative intent from legislative inaction where there are several possible reasons for defeat
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Raker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Armstead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-03-20· cited 95×
- Coleman v. Soccer Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-07-09· cited 43×
- Warr v. JMGM Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-07-25· cited 28×
- Savage v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-08-04· cited 22×
- Markham v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-11-25· cited 18×
- State v. BranchCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-06-01· cited 17×
- State v. StoaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2006-08-07· cited 16×
- State v. AbeskaronNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-11-24· cited 14×
- State v. WilliamsonIdaho Court of Appeals· 2007-05-17· cited 13×
- Jury v. Department of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-12-26· cited 13×
- Izer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-02-05· cited 10×
- Brook Park v. Rodojev (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-06-10· cited 10×
- People v. MannAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-01-15· cited 7×
- Jury v. State, Dept. of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-12-26· cited 6×
- Hector v. Bank of New York MellonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2021-06-03· cited 6×
- Montgomery Cnty. v. Complete Lawn Care, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-05-02· cited 5×
- Montgomery Mutual Insurance v. ChessonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-09-20· cited 4×
- Alford v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-03-02· cited 3×
- In re the Admissibility of Motor Vehicle Speed ReadingsNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-06-13· cited 2×
- City of Brookpark v. RodojevCourt of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County· 2018-12-13· cited 2×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Schneidewind v. ANR Pipeline Co.Supreme Court· 1988-03-22· cited 488×
- Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-09-06· cited 224×
- Police Commissioner v. DowlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-11-04· cited 122×
- Rose v. Fox Pool Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-07-05· cited 101×
- Harden v. Mass Transit AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-04-09· cited 88×
- Richwind Joint Venture 4 v. BrunsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-08-22· cited 78×
- Tidewater/Havre De Grace, Inc. v. Mayor of Havre De GraceCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-02-09· cited 75×
- Fairbanks v. McCarterCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-03-31· cited 52×
- State v. LinnIdaho Supreme Court· 1969-12-24· cited 48×
- United States v. BrunoE.D. Pennsylvania· 1971-09-24· cited 46×
- Automobile Trade Ass'n v. Insurance CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-11-25· cited 44×
- Brooke v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1959-06-01· cited 40×
- People v. MendiblesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-03-30· cited 40×
- T.H.E. Insurance v. P.T.P. Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-07-29· cited 39×
- People v. BuschCalifornia Supreme Court· 1961-11-22· cited 38×
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1958-10-29· cited 38×
- State v. StoutSupreme Court of Missouri· 1972-03-13· cited 25×
- People v. AlstonNew York Supreme Court· 1974-12-11· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.