State v. Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prejudice from question concerning the treatment of defendants found not guilty by reason of insanity to be cured by immediately sustaining objection and by a curative instruction to the jury
• error cured in part by immediate instruction to ignore improper question because objection was sustained, and it had no basis in the evidence
• error cured in part by immediate instruction to ignore improper question because objection was sustained, and it had no basis in the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cornell
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1994-08-02· cited 97×
• State v. Kemp
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1996-02-29· cited 49×
• State v. Cobb
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-06-01· cited 49×
• State v. Curry
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-07-30· cited 11×
• Stewart v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1976-03-25· cited 9×
• State v. Humphrey
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-02-27· cited 4×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Brady
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1969-11-13· cited 49×
• State v. Goodyear
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1965-07-19· cited 40×
• State v. Branch
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1972-06-16· cited 33×
• State v. Williams
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1971-06-11· cited 24×
• State v. Clark
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1967-12-06· cited 18×
• State v. Puffer
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1973-11-28· cited 15×
• State v. Chambers
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1967-05-24· cited 11×