State v. Padilla

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the testimony about the defendant’s prior drug contacts with an undercover officer was admissible under Rule 404(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Valles
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1989-09-21· cited 234×
• State v. Perea
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-11-01· cited 31×
• State v. Brown
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-03-06· cited 26×
• State v. Martinez
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-12-04· cited 12×
• State v. Clow
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 8×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Dessureault
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1969-04-30· cited 227×
• State v. Marahrens
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-02-01· cited 28×
• State v. Williams
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1971-06-11· cited 24×