Skip to main content

State v. Alfonso

Citations

  • 195 Conn. 624
  • 490 A.2d 75
  • 1985 Conn. LEXIS 730

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that, “‘[w]hile it is true that it is within the province of the jury to accept or reject a defendant’s testimony, a jury in rejecting such testimony cannot conclude that the opposite is true’”
  • holding evidence of possession insufficient as to one of two counts on which defendant convicted
  • without supporting evidence, no inference could be made that the defendant possessed the marihuana found in the common area of an apartment
  • insufficient evidence to infer possession of one drug, but sufficient evidence, including additional predicate facts, to allow inference of possession of another drug
  • statement by defendant that cocaine seized from multiple occupant apartment was his sufficient to show possession
  • drugs found in common area of an apartment were not possessed by the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parskey, Peters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Alfonso

11 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.