Skip to main content

State v. Wilkins

Citations

  • 302 Ga. 156
  • 805 S.E.2d 868

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “a statement which was not made ‘to conceal the conspiracy and served only to disclose the scheme,’ or which ‘merely inform[ed] the listener of the declarant’s activities,’” was not admissible under Rule 801 (d) (2) (E)
  • no abuse of discretion in trial court’s exclusion of co-defendant’s statements recounting the circumstances of the murders to 26 witnesses
  • \Statements made to solicit membership or participation in the conspiracy and statements explaining the conspiracy to a new member are made in furtherance of the conspiracy.\
  • “Statements made to solicit membership or participation in the conspiracy and statements explaining the conspiracy to a new member are made in furtherance of the conspiracy.”
  • “(A) retrospective statement regarding matters that have already occurred, and that is not intended to foster involvement in the conspiracy, is not a statement in furtherance of the conspiracy.” (citation and punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.