Skip to main content

JONES v. the STATE.

Citations

  • 812 S.E.2d 337

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • investigator who had been employed as a deputy with the sheriff’s office and who had personal knowledge of the investigation in the case was able to lay a proper foundation for intoxilyzer printout cards
  • for purposes of OCGA § 24-9-902 (11), an “other qualified person” need not have personal knowledge of the preparation of the records, but “must be familiar with the creation and record keeping procedures of the organization”
  • admission of log sheets did not violate best evidence rule where original printouts could not be located even after the investigator conducted a multi-source search and the defendant had not pointed to any evidence in the record 8 Because OCGA §§ 24-10-1002 and 24-10-1004 (1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMillian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.