State v. Wilkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Given that the entire case must be remanded for resentencing, ORS 138.222(5), the court necessarily will have the opportunity to address defendant’s [unpreserved] arguments as to the compensatory fine.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Eadie
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-12-06· cited 75×
• State v. Camacho-Alvarez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-07· cited 48×
• State v. Rodvelt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-04-03· cited 24×
• State v. Hathaway
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-09-13· cited 6×
• State v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-03· cited 4×
• State v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-10-04· cited 2×
• State v. Renner
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-13· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 1,060×
• State v. Brown
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-09-20· cited 504×
• State v. Lotches
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-29· cited 125×
• State v. Barrett
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-09-14· cited 96×
• State v. Wright
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1996-03-21· cited 52×
• State v. Phillips
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-10-22· cited 35×
• State v. Busby
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-01-28· cited 30×
• State v. Hessel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-12-09· cited 15×
• State v. Batty
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-09-25· cited 7×
• State v. Gleason
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-06-19· cited 6×
• State v. Reynolds
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-02-06· cited 5×