State v. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that judicial efficiency weighed in favor of correcting a plainly erroneous sentence rather than affirming “with the surmise that defendant might, at some time in the future, seek modification of the judgment under ORS 138.083(1)(a)”
• sentencing court erred by imposing separate concurrent sentences on multiple convictions that should have been merged under ORS 161.067
• where a court merges guilty verdicts, it must enter a single conviction for those merged counts and “concomitantly, a single sentence thereon”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cockrell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-04-12· cited 3×
• State v. Wilcox
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-04-04· cited 1×
• State v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-03
• State v. Wallace
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-04

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 1,060×
• State v. Barrett
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-09-14· cited 96×
• State v. Rood
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-08-10· cited 21×
• State v. Slawson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-10-06· cited 15×
• State v. Wilkins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-08-08· cited 13×
• State v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-10-04· cited 2×