State v. Hathaway

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that both the Supreme Court and this court have consistently exercised discretion to address plainly erroneous failures to merge convictions
• noting that both the Supreme Court and this court have consistently exercised discretion to address plainly erroneous failures to merge convictions
• exercise of Ailes discretion to correct erroneous failure to merge justified, in part, because, “although the effects of merger are not always immediately apparent, they can be real and varied” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• exercise of Ailes discretion to correct erroneous failure to merge justified, in part, because, ‘although the effects of merger are not always immediately apparent, they can be real and varied’ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Reynolds
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-20· cited 63×
• State v. Miles
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-01-04· cited 5×
• State v. Oliver
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-07-23· cited 4×
• State v. Foster
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-07-31

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Eadie
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-12-06· cited 75×
• State v. Tiner
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-05-18· cited 35×
• State v. Wilkins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-08-08· cited 13×
• State v. Walraven
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-05-22· cited 5×